Although the efficacy of exposure-based therapies in the treatment of PTSD is well established, there has been some reluctance to use these therapies in individuals with co-occurring SUDs because of fear that evoking vivid memories of trauma exposure would worsen substance use or lead to relapse or both.
Therefore, during construction of a draft, attention distracting environment should be avoided, and this step should be completed within 1—2 hours.
Before sending the manuscript to internal, and external referees, we should contact with them, and ask them if they have time to review our manuscript.
The introductory paragraph contains the main idea of performing the study in question. Describe what additional research might resolve contradictions or explain exceptions. Especially before writing the manuscript, the most writing research discussion section step at the start is to construct a draft, and completion of the manuscript on a theoretical basis.
Comments coming from the reviewers should be criticized, but a defensive attitude should not be assumed during this evaluation process. Nowadays, articles questioning available information, rather than confirmatory ones attract attention.
Generally, after completion of the study, it is very difficult to solve the problems which might be discerned during the writing process.
Maintain an objective and analytical tone.
The table below offers some questions effective discussion sections in scientific reports address. The Discussion section is sort of an odd beast because it is here where you speculate, but must avoid rambling, guessing, or making logical leaps beyond what is reasonably supported for your data.
Importantly, rural patients, who are more likely to benefit from telehealth interventions as a means of improving access to care, are no more reluctant to use such services than their urban counterparts.
Besides application of a template which contains the intended clear-cut messages to be followed will contribute to the communication of net messages.
Additionally, we address various issues regarding manuscripts in general. Probably the most important mistakes made related to the writing process of a manuscript include lack of a clear message of the manuscript, inclusion of more than one main idea in the same text or provision of numerous unrelated results at the same time so as to reinforce the assertions of the manuscript.
Several preliminary studies conducted in the past several years suggest that exposure-based therapy can be used in individuals with cooccurring SUDs and PTSD as long as careful attention is paid to substance use.
Relatedly, reading and IMing at the same time may also not have stretched their abilities as multitaskers. Subsequently, in the light of the current literature this finding is discussed, new ideas on this subject are revealed, and the paragraph ends with a concluding remark.
Did the study achieve the goal resolve the problem, answer the question, support the hypothesis presented in the Introduction? Technical writing elements Embrace active voice because it eliminates the awkward phrasing and wordiness that accompanies passive voice.
One of them is to allocate at least 30 minutes a day for writing a manuscript which amounts to 3.Feb 12, · Writing manuscripts to describe study outcomes, although not easy, is the main task of an academician.
The aim of the present review is to outline the main aspects of writing the discussion section of a manuscript.
Additionally, we address various issues regarding manuscripts in general. It is. Think of the results section as the place where you report what your study found; think of the discussion section as the place where you interpret your data and answer the "So What?" question.
As you become more skilled writing research papers, you may want to meld the results of your study with a discussion of its implications. Writing the Discussion The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
So reread your introduction carefully before writing the discussion; you will discuss how the hypothesis has been demonstrated by the new research and then show how the field's. The discussion section is often considered the most important part of your research paper because this is where you: Most effectively demonstrates your ability as a researcher to think critically about an issue, to develop creative solutions to problems based upon a logical synthesis of the findings, and to formulate a deeper, more profound.
This section describes an organizational structure commonly used to report experimental research in many scientific disciplines, the IMRAD format: Introduction, Methods, Results, And Discussion. Although the main headings are standard for many scientific fields, details may vary; check with your instructor, or, if submitting an article to a journal.
The Difficulties of Writing a Discussion Section. In an ideal world, you could simply reject your null or alternative hypotheses according to the significance levels found by the statistics.
That is the main point of your discussion section, but the process is usually a lot more complex than that.Download